Google Glass for Consumers ‘A Year-ish Away’

Eric-Schmidt

People have justifiably wary of wearable computers and augmented reality, since their history doesn’t offer a stellar track record. Google Glass, on the other hand, has been captivating technology blogs and consumers since its inception, and I’m among the people very impressed. Eric Schmidt just broke the news that the digital specs will be available in a year or so.

“It would be fair to say that there’ll be thousands of these in use by developers over the next months. And then based on their feedback, we’ll make some product changes, and it’s probably a year-ish away.” Schmidt said during an interview with BBC Radio 4′s World at One on Monday.

The technology of Google’s augmented reality glasses includes a heads-up display, voice command, and photography. Developers started getting their hands on Glass last week.

Schmidt noted that with augmented reality, technology has immense potential for different applications.

“There are tremendous numbers of applications that can be imagined — augmented reality, where you see what’s going on in real-time, and then we annotate that. We say, ‘oh that’s this building,’ or ‘this is something that you’ve already done,’ or those sorts of things.”

Augmented reality has come a long way in the past few years, especially with the rise of more sophisticated mobile technology.

Interestingly, the Google chairman also discussed the need for a “new social etiquette” when it comes to privacy concerns brought about by something like Glass.

“It’s obviously not appropriate to wear these glasses in situations where recording is not correct. And indeed, you have this problem already with phones. Companies like Google have a very important responsibility to keep your information safe, but you have a responsibility as well, which is to understand what you’re doing, how you’re doing it, and behave appropriately and also keep everything up-to-date.”

Indeed, privacy and technology have often mixed like water and oil, especially when laws try to keep pace with rapidly improving technology. It remains to be seen how Schmidt will uphold this commitment, and what other organizations will do.

In the meantime, next year I’ll probably be spending more time wearing glasses.

Why Small Businesses Should Love Yelp

Small Businesses YelpOf all the review sites and social media profiles that strike a nerve with small businesses, Yelp seems to be the amalgamation of everything business owners hate about online, anonymous reviews. Blog posts have been penned on why you can’t trust Yelp, there are dozens of articles on what you can do about Yelp as a small business, and there are entire blogs dedicated to compiling some of the most offensive one star reviews.

The purpose of this article isn’t to suggest that Yelp is infallible or that customers who write one star reviews complaining about twenty seconds being a “long wait time” to receive their orders are correct. Yes, there are a lot of problems with Yelp that have been covered in plenty of detail, and Yelp recently defeated a lawsuit against its infamously arbitrary review filter. This also generally applies to online review sites overall, but Yelp is generally used as their collective ambassador.

When put in perspective, Yelp and online review sites arm businesses with an invaluable tool that they never had until the 2000s when online reviews started taking off. I was in a meeting with a client recently and an employee was expressing exasperation at how how you can say anything online, and that there’s nothing the business can do about it.

The point that people can say anything online is true, but what makes this a “forest for the trees” statement is remembering that people can say anything offline too. Anonymity has certainly made it easier for people to be more freely vitriolic to more people without worrying about the consequences, but as a practice bad word-of-mouth isn’t new. The Internet didn’t conceive angry complaints, ugly rumors, and irate former employees seeking to destroy their former workplaces. The ability to see and react to these reviews and accusations in a public forum is an unprecedented level of market research and customer communication for business owners, and it can mean the difference between a customer who spends the next year patronizing your competitor or a customer who gives you another chance.

Consider some of the examples I’ve raised earlier: A sales associate being slightly rude to people, a customer who decides to spread a rumor based on a bad experience, or a former employee out to ruin your online reputation. Several negative reviews on Yelp will not only highlight the problem but reveal it very quickly and help you roughly determine the number of people affected. Without Yelp or Google Reviews you may not learn about this type of problem months or even years later, by which time it can cost thousands of dollars in lost business.

Another comment that this employee had is that she and her husband usually don’t comment or complain when they’ve had a poor experience and simply never patronize the business again. I understand this perspective from a consumer standpoint, but as a business owner this should be what you strive to avoid. It’s a worst case scenario to be losing business and not know what pushes customers away. If there’s a rude sales associate or a bad rumor, you should want to know as soon as possible so you can deal with it.

The second point – that businesses can’t do anything about Yelp or Google Reviews – is hogwash. Part of the problem is that business owners focus squarely on their inability to remove bad feedback, which is only going to make things much worse. As a business owner you have the ability to claim business listings and respond to reviews publicly and privately. By reaching out proactively to these complainants, you’re demonstrating to everybody who visits Yelp that you care enough to remedy a bad situation. It makes you look better and it can turn an unhappy customer into a brand ambassador.

The hard truth about running a business is that people who are upset, angry, or just venting are going to speak ill about your business either way, online or offline, whether their complaints are valid or not. As painful and frustrating as it can be to see it, take a deep breath and think about how you can leverage bad reviews as positive things for you and your business. If it helps, keep Yelp’s own points in mind when thinking about the people behind the keyboard:

  • Your reviewers are your paying customers (author’s note: usually, anyway)
  • Your reviewers are human beings with (sometimes unpredictable) feelings and sensitivities
  • Your reviewers are vocal and opinionated (otherwise they would not be writing reviews!)
These are humans writing these reviews, not impish demons hellbent on ruining your business. Approach and treat them like people, and you may very surprised at how quickly you can turn around a bad situation.

The Fall and Redemption of Hewlett-Packard’s Customer Service

Customer Service

About a month ago, I had planned for this article to be a scathing, searing condemnation of Hewlett-Packard and a declaration that it was on the same level as Electronic Arts. A lot has happened since then. This is a story about a company’s fall from grace in the eyes of a customer, and how it redeemed itself through good service and sincere efforts to make amends.

I purchased a high end desktop from Hewlett-Packard in December. Mine is a very media-intensive profession, and I’d mostly been relying on a Sony Vaio that did the job, but started sputtering if I ran anything as simple as Photoshop or Minecraft. Based on recommendations and positive feedback – and the fact that a bad customer service experience with Dell has still left me scarred – I bought the HP Envy Phoenix model. Beautiful, sleek, and it ran like a dream initially.

About two months later, any media related activity – including things as simple as uploading photos and watching YouTube videos – started causing freezes and crashes, followed by bad reboots. Within a few weeks, it was impossible to do any work. I theorized that this was a graphics card problem and contacted HP. They promised to send a technician over to make the necessary repairs, and the people I spoke to seemed capable and patient. So far, so good.

I got a call a day before the scheduled repair date that HP would be missing their appointment. I was mildly annoyed, but figured things happened and patiently rescheduled for the following week. The day of the appointment I got a call from HP, saying they had to reschedule again and that they had been “unable” to get in touch with me. I hadn’t received any missed calls, voicemails, or E-mails and was more irritated this time, but we rescheduled again. Saturday between 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM.

By 6:00 PM that Saturday, my blood was boiling. No technician, no phone call, no explanation, no apology. The third missed appointment. By that point, all bets were off and I did what anyone in my situation is justified doing: I whined, screamed, and threw a tantrum.

customerservice2

Take note, businesses: Customers usually aren’t screaming because they have anger issues or they’re out to make your life miserable. They feel powerless.  When people in my situation talk and don’t hear responses, their raised voices are fueled by their resulting indignation. Yelling and raging is a way of taking that power back. If you want to avoid the vast majority of irate customers – especially as a bigger company – make sure your customers feel like they’re being heard. We all know nobody likes dealing with complaints, so don’t make your customers feel like they have to resort to shouting.

In my case, I found Hewlett Packard has a very active LinkedIn audience and I quickly started a group discussion angrily outlining my problem. I personally reached out to as many marketing and customer support employees as I could find to express my vocal rage, telling one social media strategist in particular how inexcusable it was that my inquiries on Twitter were going unanswered.

I was mollified by the response. In less than three hours, no less than ten people had messaged me on LinkedIn offering apologies, saying that my experience with Hewlett Packard was unacceptable and that they would all do what they could to help. The HP employees were geographically diverse and included some fairly senior managers, several of whom offered to advocate on my behalf. Did they only take notice because I was steaming? Probably, but they could have ignored me. I’ve seen that happen, and it only enrages people even further. Instead the professional, apologetic responses cooled me off a little.


The instant the workday started on Monday morning I was contacted by Hewlett Packard’s case management team and put in touch with an extremely supportive case manager, whom I will refer to for privacy reasons as Jane. I was still seething a little, but as I recounted my unhappy experiences, this is when things started improving significantly.

Jane listened patiently. She was very surprised and disappointed, especially when I got to the third missed appointment. This was the turning point: She admitted that Hewlett Packard “dropped the ball” and she apologized on behalf of the company. She gave me the option of an altogether brand new desktop, complete with complimentary hardware upgrades and a coupon for my troubles, or the opportunity to advocate for a refund.

After sleeping on it, I had calmed down by the following morning. Jane had sent a followup E-mail and dozens of HP employees on LinkedIn were still reaching out to offer support and apologies. Given the genuine efforts by HP to remedy a situation that had evidently gotten out of hand, I opted for the replacement, and thanks to Jane’s advocacy, shipping was expedited and the replacement arrived a week before the projected delivery date.

I’ve typed this blog post on my replacement desktop, which is working so far. In hindsight I’m glad I gave HP a second chance, even though this shouldn’t have had to happen at all. It’s entirely possible that I just fell through the cracks, but their representative took responsibility, admitted fault, and offered reasonable compensation for my troubles. 

If you’re reading this as a consumer, here’s your takeaway: Don’t stay silent. I will defend HP on the point that they and other companies can’t fix your problem if they don’t know about it. The people you need to be in touch with are easier to find and you as a consumer have much bigger loudspeakers than you did ten years ago. More importantly, don’t be afraid to get angry. If being civil has resulted in stonewalling, incapable support, or missed appointments, throw your hissy fit. You’ve paid for something and the seller has promises and expectations to live up to.

Electronic Arts’ Open Contempt for its Customers

SimCityPictured: A visual representation of the SimCity launch (blog.games.com)

It’s been a week since the newest iteration of SimCity launched, and Electronic Arts has demonstrated such disregard for for the customers who keep it in business that there can no longer be any doubt of this publisher being worthy of the Worst Company in America award by Consumerist.

If you don’t follow the video game industry, here’s a bit of background: SimCity is a reboot of the classic decade-spanning franchise. It launched with online-only digital rights management, meaning you have to be online to play even if you want to play by yourself. This was allegedly done because of a “vision” Maxis and Electronic Arts had, which has been sharply contested. Forcing everybody to be online put a strain on the game’s servers immediately, rendering it unplayable for many more than a week after they paid $60.

In the subsequent week, Electronic Arts has handled the resulting public relations disaster so ham-handedly that video game journalists have devoted entire sections of their sites to covering blunder after blunder.

What grates me – and why I haven’t bought SimCity and likely won’t for a long time – isn’t Electronic Arts’ failure to address a problem everybody expected. Instead, it’s the company’s constant attempts to shift the blame to the very people being hurt by this problem: You.

One of the worst examples of this has come from senior producer Kip Katsarelis. In a post on the Electronic Arts forums he noted that ”What we saw was that players were having such a good time they didn’t want to leave the game, which kept our servers packed and made it difficult for new players to join.”

In short, it’s your fault for wanting to play the game you just paid $60 for. It’s everybody’s fault but EA’s. This statement isn’t just disingenuous; it’s outright insulting. Electronic Arts anticipated this just like everybody else did. They knowingly released a product that remain broken for an indeterminate period of time, taking customers’ money for it anyway, and somehow EA has still made this your problem. 

This segways into one of the biggest slaps in the face Electronic Arts has given its customers: No refund for you. Amazon is offering refunds, but if you bought the game directly from EA, you’re stuck with a product that’s still unplayable as of this writing. Origin global community manager Marcel Hatam apologized to players and initially directed players to seek a refund, but Hatam’s post was edited and merely asks customers to “please review our refund policy here,” which notes that Origin doesn’t offer refunds except for “special mitigating circumstances”. One would think that the game being broken is a special case, but Origin’s terms seem to be whatever EA interprets them as.

One user went as far as planning to call his credit card company to dispute the charge, prompting a warning that his Origin account would be banned before EA quickly backpedaled on this too, even having the gall to call it a “rumor”. All of this makes any apologies from EA and Maxis hollow and transparent, simply because they’re not sorry. They have your money and now you’re expected to sit back and wait for EA to get its act together.

The closest thing to reconciliation EA has done is to offer a free game to people who activate a copy of SimCity before March 18, which feels like a cynical attempt to just drive up sales in the wake of this disaster rather than any meaningful way to rebuild burned bridges.

Then came the revelation that SimCity could have easily had an offline mode, when a Reddit modder discovered how to access the game’s debug mode. He had to go online for the game to save his progress, but otherwise he was able to play offline seamlessly. This directly contradicted earlier claims by EA and Maxis about how “hard” making the game single player would be, and lead to Maxis general manager Lucy Bradshaw explaining this as a decision based on Maxis’ vision rather than decisions to stem piracy or to exert control of consumers:

“So, could we have built a subset offline mode? Yes, but we rejected that idea because it didn’t fit with our vision. We did not focus on the ‘single city in isolation’ that we have delivered in past SimCities. We recognize that there are fans—people who love the original SimCity—who want that. But we’re also hearing from thousands of people who are playing across regions, trading, communicating and loving the Always-Connected functionality. The SimCity we delivered captures the magic of its heritage but catches up with ever-improving technology.”

Setting aside Bradshaw’s admission that EA and Maxis lied and that “ever-improving technology” doesn’t include competent servers, all this really does is further condemn EA and Maxis.  Even if I accept the argument that forcing customers to maintain persisting Internet connections was a “vision”, EA and Maxis placed their vision ahead of what consumers wanted. The debate of how much demand there was for an online, constantly connected “game as a service” is an open question, but all I’m seeing is a lot of people crying foul and asking for refunds.

The greater problem is that online-only has no benefit to the player. The ability to play online can have tremendous benefits, but forced online play is an inconvenience. It’s a disservice to people who live in areas with weaker broadband, people who want to play SimCity on a train or during a flight, and to people in parts of the world that barely have Internet at all. Just look at all of the people who bought the game and have solid Internet connections but can’t enjoy it through no fault of their own.

The only thing the SimCity launch has done is demonstrate how little Electronic Arts cares about its own customers. EA and Maxis decided that your entertainment was acceptable collateral damage in releasing the game before the servers could handle the traffic, which is not an appropriate business model for the entertainment industry. Over the past week they’ve made blog updates, held conference calls, done interviews, but have done everything except try to remedy this in a manner that would be most beneficial to SimCity fans. I can outline what EA can easily do to mend fences right now:

-Issue a simple, sincere apology and offer refunds to everybody who asks
-Admit that online only-DRM was not done for the player’s benefit
-Patch SimCity to allow offline play while retaining the online component

I don’t see what EA has to lose at this point by at least trying to be honest. The company is already despised, and in the last few years, it seems to be taking its most hated practices to new levels. Just because you can get away with shoddy business practices today doesn’t mean you can tomorrow, and gamers are turning on this company. EA should sit down and start thinking hard about its relationships with the people keeping them in business before it’s too late. Even then, I wonder if it already is now.

On the plus side, at least the DRM stopped piracy, right?

Update on 3/10/2013: Just when you thought EA couldn’t get more condescending, one of the games they’re offering for free as compensation for SimCity players is its single player predecessor, SimCity 4. So your reward for buying a bad product is to get a free copy of its better older sibling.


Update on 3/21/2013: The fallout continues as CEO John Riccitiello has resigned. SimCity is just the culmination of a tenure marred by broken promises and repeating the same practices Riccitello once condemned. As optimistic as I was back in 2009 about the state of EA, I won’t be mourning his departure and neither should you.

Making Your Facebook Offers Worth It

Offer

AllFacebook posted an interesting article recently. Facebook has been congratulating itself for its Facebook Offers program, but Business Insider has been taking issue with how many offers are merely “claimed” versus how many claimed offers are claimed in the context of acting on the offer and redeeming it at the physical location or online store.

I will say that the number of redeemed offers is an important statistic to track. Knowing the revenue generated by a Facebook Offer allows businesses to better define their cost-benefit analysis. Facebook Offers cost money to run, and the tab can be significant depending on how many people you promote the offer to. More importantly, you want to use social media to generate revenue, right?

My first problem with this article is that the announcement of people not following through on claimed offers is anything revelatory. People print out coupons or take entry forms for contests but don’t follow through on them all the time, and the concept of Facebook Offers isn’t any different. People redeem promotional codes for online stores all the time and there’s always going to be a percentage of people who don’t follow through on them.

The only difference is that people see how many users have actually claimed a copy of the offer in real time. If Facebook users misinterpret the number of offer claims as actual sales, that isn’t Facebook’s problem. These offers may not have been redeemed, but a claimed offer doesn’t mean redemption on its own. A claim is just a simple measure of eligibility amongst other Facebook users.

When a Facebook user sees an offer for 50% off a large pizza, for example, they need to claim a copy of the offer in order to make themselves eligible to receive it. By claiming the offer, they’ve declared their eligibility to redeem it. On its own, a claim can potentially great for exposure when I.M. Gangsta’s profile displays to his 700 friends that he claimed a page’s offer, which is a great trade-off for a single mouse click.

I will concede that Business Insider has a valid point when it comes to clicks generating erroneous Offer claims, but Facebook isn’t actively confusing offer claims with sales. For claims to actually be misleading, Facebook would have to know in advance that people would interpret a claim as a sale and use the language anyway. It’s certainly possible that they intended it, but it’s a hypothetical stretch at best.

When the issue becomes how to maximize redemption rates for your Facebook Offers, simply make your offer memorable and enticing enough that people follow through on it. Based on personal experience Facebook Offers has been a fantastic way to drive online or offline traffic by providing specific incentives that also take advantage of Facebook’s word-of-mouth capabilities. Offers are already a great way to promote your page, but the onus is on you – the business owner – to make people take that extra step.

The Nifty New Facebook Newsfeed Ad Campaign Display

I logged in yesterday and was pleasantly surprised to see this on my news feed:

Facebook Ad Campaign Display

I timed it with this cat picture so you wouldn’t have to read obnoxious political debates

Facebook’s newsfeed now lets you view a summary of your ad campaigns, including the number of ads you’re running, the number of campaigns, and your daily clicks. As someone who frequently has to open the ad campaign manager page in a separate tab this is pretty helpful and a clever idea.

As Facebook becomes ever more entwined with business, I wouldn’t mind seeing if Facebook expands business features available directly through the newsfeed. Seeing the amount of money being spent on ad campaigns would be helpful, not to mention something indicating differences between ads and promoted page posts.

How to Kill Trolls With Kindness

Troll Face

There’s a simple antidote to Internet trolls. It costs nothing to manufacture and can be found in vast quantities if you know where to look.

Before this goes further let’s establish the difference between criticism and trolling. Criticism of a business is done out of imperfections such as poor service and genuine unhappiness with a product. More importantly, unhappy customers tend to be more civil. Trolls simply vent their hate wherever they have an audience, and social networks are one of their favorite nesting grounds. Ninety nine percent of the time business owners have done nothing to earn the enmity of trolls.

Dealing with trolls can be a tricky subject when it comes to a business’ social profiles. Every instinct screams to make them want to disappear.  As an administrator you have the ability to do it but people don’t consider the ramifications. Deleting their comments or outright blocking them tends to add fuel to the fire and should be done as an extreme last resort if they absolutely won’t leave you alone.

On the other hand, telling trolls to piss off, get jobs, or go through puberty elsewhere may feel good in the short term but this these exchanges are going to be visible everyone with an Internet connection. You’re letting trolls drag you down to their level and it only looks juvenile to sling mud back at them. It’s not a personality trait you want affiliated with your online voice when it’s time for consumers to buy.

There’s a much easier, more effective way to deal with trolls: Being polite and courteous, just as you would be when dealing with criticism.

I spent some time consulting for a restaurant in South Norwalk that’s serving up some delicious pizza. Their Facebook page was off to a great start complete with near-unanimous positive reviews of the food, ambiance  and service. All was well, until this insidious commenter reared his head:

Facebook Troll

 

This was an unproductive, unhelpful comment from someone who had probably never been to the restaurant, but the response is more important. We turned the comment around by claiming the commenter’s expertise on the subject, and it would have been an opportunity for potential business had the commenter taken them up on the offer. On a more subtle level, this was a polite way of saying “Put up or shut up” and a way for this troll to get down to brass tacks.

It’s been months with no word from this fellow. Either he didn’t bother checking for responses or he saw the response and decided to not press the issue. When you show trolls that you aren’t taking their trollbait, they get bored and wander off almost immediately. Only the most dedicated, vendetta-driven trolls will actively pursue an argument. When it becomes clear that they’re just out to pick a bone with you and won’t back off, use the delete tool as your little red button.

Just make sure you don’t feed the trolls.

Author’s note: This really only applies assuming the comments aren’t obscene, profane, bigoted, pornographic, or gives out personal information. If they are, don’t have any qualms about deletion.

New Gmail Compose, Better Multitasking

I had the pleasant surprise of discovering the new Gmail today while trying to keep up with the torrent of E-mail that accumulated during Hurricane Sandy. It hasn’t been completely launched, but all users can test the new feature and switch back to the old style if they don’t like it (you listening, Facebook?). Personally, I’m really liking what I’ve been seeing so far.

In the past, I’ve usually had to keep two browser tabs open for Gmail: One for composing a message or continuing a correspondence, and one for going through mail or responding it to it as it comes in. One of the most significant changes about the new Compose layout is that you can compose an E-mail in a separate tab within Gmail, similarly to how Google chat is displayed.

The actual interface is more compact and feels much cleaner than the old Gmail. Cc and Bcc options are on the right. Most of the other options are on the bottom: Formatting options, attaching files, inserting photos, inserting links, and the option to switch back to the old compose for now. As of this writing options to insert emoticons and invitations are grayed out and listed as coming soon.

While the transition to new layouts and templates hasn’t always been an easy one, I haven’t bothered to switch back to the old compose. Having the ability to browse my incoming messages as I compose something is a big step up, although users have the option to bring the compose window into a separate tab if they want to. This feels like the best of both worlds by providing new features without taking away from an older experience.

Accessing the new Gmail compose system is as simple as  the “Try out the new compose experience” message when you log into Gmail. If you’ve ever saved an E-mail draft because of a new message you wanted to look at, this is definitely a feature to check out.

How to Instantly Make Your Social Media Agency Look Terrible

Social media agencies are a dime a dozen, be they real social media agencies full of credible marketers or freelancers essentially hoping that you can’t spend five minutes looking their “agency” up on Google. One of the recurring problems I’ve encountered is how to separate the real deal from the fauxperts.  Given the low barriers to entry for someone claiming to be a social media marketing professional and the persisting hype surrounding social media, business owners and marketers alike can ponder how you determine who’s worth retaining and who should be mocked by Robert Caruso.

There’s a simple stress test: Look at their social media pages.

A real social media marketer or agency will be actively networking, chatting with people, offering lots of fresh and interesting content, and getting creative by hosting Twitter chats. A bad social media agency will be doing what they presumably advise clients to not do: Spamming sales messages, going lengthy periods of time without updating, not conversing with anyone, and generally not practicing what they preach.

[Read more...]

Six Ways You’re Annoying Your Facebook Fans

You don’t want to annoy your audience, do you?

If you answered yes, well, thanks for reading my blog, reps from Ocean Marketing. Otherwise, as a good social media community manager you’ve identified that you’re as only as successful as your fans are happy. Unfortunately, even benign actions can unknowingly cause unlikes. I’ve seen these six things done with the best of intentions, but intent doesn’t always have the results you’re looking for.

[Read more...]